· restricted Mr. Walker’s movements in a doorway without

·        On12th July the claimant Mr. Walker got into a fight with the policein Rita Road London, following a complaint that he hit his partner Mrs. CadiceLecky.·        Laterhe was charged of assault of police officer and detained for 7 hours before releasedon bail. The custody record showed that Mr.

Walker was arrested for “affray, assaultpolice officer”. ·        On23rd of September 2008 charged and detained, Walker stood trial on20-21 April 2009 in the Camberwell Green Magistrates and found innocent onbasis of his initial detention had been unlawful under the given situationbecause the district judge found that the police officer concerned, PC Adams,had restricted Mr. Walker’s movements in a doorway without purporting to arresthim.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

·        On11th February 2011 a letter of claim was written by walkers’ lawyersand his claim was issues on 2nd July, in it he claimed damages forfalse imprisonment, assault, and malicious prosecution.The trail of the civil claim took place before a judge, His HonourJudge Freeland QC, in the Central London County Court, between 1–5 July 2013and a detailed judgment was given 1 August 2013. Mr.

Walkers claim failedtotally and judge accepted police evidence over the appellant’s evidence.Because the police evidence was more credible and straightforward than theevidence backed up by walker’s mother. Furthermore, police evidence was backedby the neighbor Mr.

Buckmaster and also some of the walker’s mothers evidencewas detracted her son’s case.On thesereasoning’s County Court Judge dismissed the appellant’s claim.Mr.

Walkers Mothers Evidenceü  Mr. Walkers evidence was supported byof his mothers.Police Evidenceü  PC Adams said that on arrival at thescene that he heard Ms. Lecky say that Mr. Walker had punched her, Hecontemplated that he had enough reasons to arrest MR Walker.

PC Cracknell andPC Barton both confirmed the PC Adams Claim.ü  Despite the fact that he had enoughreasoning for arrest he decided to make some enquiries to avoid an arrest.ü  Mr. Walker was in a door way and PCAdams cornered him to prevent him getting past, His first words were “Calm downmate or you will end up getting arrested” and he made sure that appellant wasnot free to move.  ü  The appellant was shouting in anaggressive manner and firmly pushed PC Adams in the chest, at that point PCAdams decided to arrest him for “public order”.

He had no time to add thesection of the Public Order Act 1986 because at that time Mr. Walker started afight.ü  PC Adams was bitten by Mr. Walker onhis forearm and finger.ü  PC Adams evidence was supported by PCCracknell and PC Barton and Mr.

Walker’s neighbor, Ms. Buckmaster who was awitness.  ·        Consideringthose facts judge decided to dismiss the civil claim. He was convinced that PCAdams evidence was more reliable and honest and also that PC Adams acted thatway to prevent more harm being caused and to stop appellant from escaping thescene.

It was clear that cornering at the door was not to arrest but to enquireon the case.                                                                     ·        Eventhough the critical findings were in favor of the police the judge accepted andawarded Mr. Walker that he is entitled for a nominal of 5 pounds as damages forbrief and “technical” imprisonment immediately before his own initial arrest, inbasis of false imprisonment.