As you see from obokataissue , she lacks a sense of research ethics, Manipulating the dataand images from other articles and experiments and used them in her articles isnot accepted behavior from a scientist researcher.
we must awareness peopleabout the the ethics of research from fabrication and manipulation of data and scientificmisconduct and learn from this, every one must be responsible of her or his ownresearch, and should admission of scientificguilt , and gives apologist from this misconduct.In my opinion maybe there’s many reasons that’s lead obokatato this level of misconduct, it could be bias in the interpretation of factsand inadequate communication of results and methods. she has spent long hours in her experiment, growing,manipulating and testing cells in differentsway, and she sense with every hypothesis there’s a hunch in mind and he hasstrong sense about what she expected .
Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot
and she really want to prove that hersense or lunch is right, that the money wasinvested into her work was well spent, she want to get ahead in competitive field, with theintense pressure. But she has got her results and was surprised that herresults are disappointing, And she need to do like something a littlecreatively. And when she get rid of the original data, But once she startfiddling with the facts, it’s hard to stop.In part, that’s because she thought howeasy it is to fool her colleagues. Also she has enjoyed their admiration and she want behave a chance to publishe her research ,Maybe this reasons pushes obokata tothis misconduct.
in my opinion about what the journal did is a correct behaviorof scientific misconduct ,As we can see what the journal did about obokata 2paper after scientificmisconduct, they deal with the issue by investigatingthe papers by themselves, nature was provided with details of ricken investigation. and evaluate whether the evidence available supports the main conclusions ofthe paper , And then decide to withdrawal 2 papers.