Evidence that Bigfootexists is usually broken down between eyewitness, footprints, recordings, andsomatic samples, while some researchers also study folklore and indigenous legends.The first scientific study of big foot evidence, conducted by John Napier in1973, stated if people were looking for a conclusion based on the ‘hard’evidence, science must declare ‘bigfoot does not exist’. He believed ignoring thousandsof eyewitness accounts and tracks scattered over 125,000 square miles, would bevery difficult. In conclusion he believes big foot exists, whether it’s the waythe general public perceives it to be, or a totally different creature alltogether, but there is some creature in North-West North America that needsexplaining.
The strongest evidence issomatic samples as this is scientific and therefore the most reliable. A groupof researchers brought to attention a video of a creature in Kentucky, coarsehairs, tissue samples, drops of blood, and tooth marks. One hundred andthirteen samples of hair, mucus, blood, nails, saliva, and skin with hair andtissue were collected from thirty-four places around North America. All thesamples turned out to be human, however, when looking at the genome sequences,parts of the DNA did not match any other species seen before. They believe itto be a genetic hybrid that originated from modern human females. 11 laboratoriesand universities, who were all given a blind sample of the DNA, backed thestatements made.