GeorgeOrwell, similar to numerous other literary-scholars, is concerned about themodern practice of the English-language and, especially, the misuse and abuseof the English language. He realized that the languagehas the influence in the policies to cover the reality and misleading thegeneral public, and George Orwell desires to grow the public mindfulness ofthis influence.
George Orwell has this byintroducing a greater emphasison the Newspeak andthe media in his famous novel NineteenEighty-Four. Representing the recurrent misuse of the language by thegovernment and by the media in his novel, Orwell shows how language could be used governmentally to mislead and influencepersons, prominent to the society in which the persons unthinkingly obeys theiradministration and senselessly admit all of the propagandaas a reality. The Role of Language has a mind-control instrument, with thefinal aim being the obliteration of the will and the imagination. Such as JohnWain has written in his essay that, “Orwell’s vision of 1984 does not includeextinction weapons . . . He is not interested in extinction weapons because,fundamentally, they do not frighten him as much as spiritual ones”(Languagein George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)).The language melody inGeorge Orwell’s novel has its origins in the story of the Tower of Babel.
WhenGod has abolishes the Towel of Babel, the societies which have helped in thebuilding of the Tower that suffers forever afterward from the Curse of Confusion.The Curse together creates the languages “mutually unintelligible,” and changes their situation so that “they nolonger lucidly express the nature of things, but rather obscured and distort them”(Languagein George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)). George Orwell’s Newspeak, the extremely politicalnovel language that is introducedin the year Nineteen Eighty-Four, does exactly that: it enables manipulation and deception, and it determines to limit the consideration of the actual world. It is further suggested that consequence to thisis that “each post-Babel language becomes a closed system containing itsuntranslatable view of the world”(Languagein George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)). Surely, the final purpose of Newspeak is toenfold individuals in orthodox-pseudo realism and isolates them from the actualworld. Whileindividuals normally struggle to increasetheir lexicon, the administration in Nineteen Eighty-Four basicallyfocuses on cut-back the vocabulary ofNewspeak.
One of the engineers ofNewspeak engineers told, “we’re cutting the language down to the bone . . .Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller everyyear”(Languagein George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)). By operating the language, the administration desires toalter the society’s method of thoughtful. Thiscould be completed, psychologiststheories, since the arguments that are obtainable for the determination ofinteractive thoughts tend to beinfluential in the way persons often consider. The linguist Benjamin Lee Whorfwas a very strong believer in thisconnection amongst language and thought, and he theorized that “differentlanguages impose different conceptions of reality”(Languagein George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)). Thus when the words that explainspecific thoughts that are absent fromthe language, that thoughts turn out to be further problematic to consider ofand to interconnect.
For the Inner Party, the aim is to enforce an orthodoxrealism and makes the heretical thoughts unbearable. “In the end, we shall make thoughtcrime impossible,” explains the Newspeak engineer, “becausethere will be no words in which to express it”(Languagein George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)). In termof design, Newspeak tightens the variety of thoughtfulness and abridgesindividual’s retentions.
It is consequently perfect for an authoritarian system, wherein the administration has to dependon the inactive community which wants liberated thoughts and which has excellentbroadmindedness for the errors, both present, andpast. “To expand language is to expand the ability to think,” says Myers.Equally, to limit the role of language, as with the Newspeak, is to confine thevariety of thoughts. The explicit sorts of Newspeak that assists in limiting the thought: “reduced complexity, fewabstractions, and no self-reference.” Thisnarrowed public believes what the Inner-Party desires, since a society that cannotdeliberate intensely poses lesser of the danger than one that could eagerlycriticize the administration and protect itself from the harm.