he ranked and one is consisted the informational justice

he Rotated Factor Matrix Table 8. is key for understanding the results of the analysis. Factors are
rotated so that they are easier to interpret. Rotation where different items are explained or predicted by
different underlying factors, and each factor explains more than one item. However, in cases where
factor loadings tended to be close to one another or items load on more than one factor, varimax
rotation were employed.

From Table 8 below, the ranking of items and the analysis of expressions revealed that in the first
factor, a total of 9 items were ranked all of them constituted the informative justice dimension, also
the first factor could explain 13.646% of the total variance which is known from the total variance
Table 7. In the second factor, total 9 items were ranked. All of nine items were those that constituted
the distributive justice dimension. Total variance explained by second factor 13.543%. In the third
factor, a total items of 6 were ranked and all are those consisted the interpersonal west justice
dimension, and the total variance explained by the third factor is 9.431%. In the forth factor, a total
items of 5 were ranked and all are those consisted the procedural justice dimension, and the total
variance explained by the fourth factor is 8.974%. In the fifth factor, a total items of 6 were ranked
and all are those consisted the policy justice dimension, and the total variance explained by the fifth
factor is 7.766%. In the sixth faxtor, a total items of 5 were ranked and all are those consisted the
interpersonal east justice dimension, and the total variance explained by the sixth factor is 6.518% . In
the seventh factor, a total items of 2 were ranked and one is consisted the informational justice
dimension and the other consisted the distributive justice dimension, and the total variance explained
by the seventh factor is 2.818%.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Note that the analysis has sorted the 42 items into seven somewhat overlapping groups of items, as
shown in the Rotated factor Matrix Table 8. The items are sorted so that the items that have the
highest loading from factor 1 (nine items in this analysis) are listed first, and they are sorted from the
one with the highest factor weight or loading (i.e., item INFJ4 Advance_explanation, with a loading
of .777) to the one with the lowest loading from that first factor (itemINFJ1
Decisions_communicated_time). Actually, every item has some loading from every factor, but the
requested for loadings in this analysis was less than |.30| to be excluded from the output, so there are
blanks where low loadings exist.