In performance of rituals that were traditionally established for

In today’s world, there are many
people from different backgrounds that mold their lives around the two human
modes of interpersonal interactions, rituals and sincerity. The human
characteristic, sincerity, if attained, is the antidote to empowering people to
achieve personal refinement, whereas participating in rituals offers guidance
towards the framing of people’s actions. Although people may perceive one mode has
a higher superiority over the other comprised in their philosophical framework,
both can be interchanged depending on the situation. Therefore, superiority
between the two does not exist. Possessing a sincere structure influences
people’s lives that suits the performance of rituals that were traditionally
established for several reasons.

advantages can originate through people who are sincere. Sincerity is perceived
as a pure thought in which requires people to have their own personal freedom.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

It is considered to be a rare quality for a person to have that enables the
participant to be vulnerable to intersubjective openness. Also, sincerity
implies authenticity that creates clarity, honesty, and simplicity, without any
hidden complications or rules and regulations to follow. It is purely from the
heart. In this case,
the religious tradition of choice is Christianity. The Christian faith utilizes
several prescribed rituals or in Christian terms, “sacraments,” that convey
God’s power. These sacraments include, Baptism, Confirmation, Communion,
Confession, Anointing of the Sick, Marriage, and Holy Orders in entirety,
sculpts the theology of Christianity altogether. Of the seven sacraments, only
Marriage requires true sincerity. An example of this is a wedding in part of marriage of the Catholic faith.

Marriage unites a couple in faithful
and mutual love that is a way to respond to God’s call to holiness. That means
that each person has developed sincerity between one another. A situation in
which proves true sincerity amongst one another is if the two were in disparity
of worship. Corinthians 7:14 states, “For the unbelieving husband has
been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified
through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as
it is, they are holy.” The examination of this passage develops a conclusion
for the answer of true sincerity. If the
non-believing Catholic participant does not want to accept the grace of
conversion, that member does not possess true sincerity. However, if the non-believing
Catholic participant does accept the grace of conversion, the creation of
sincere married love is initiated through the free conversion of the non-believer.

Once invested in the newly acquired religion, the importance of sincerity in
the Catholic marriage is fundamental for following God. Participants cannot receive
God’s blessing if they disregard sincerity amongst God, ourselves, and other
participants. Having a modest marriage is directly correlated to sincerity and
for that reason, only the most modest participants receive God’s blessing.   

over to a different situation can give ritual the advantage. Reasoning to support this is
the recognition of ritual in ritual framework versus the sincere framework. Participants who pursue a ritual
framework create their own fictitious universe where common rituals insinuate a
sense of equality. It is described to be an “as if” universe in which
participants are framed to live in a universe that is whole, certain, and
coherent. This is also known as the act of ritual framing for
participants that unite themselves around the cultural construct of the
movement without directly addressing their targets. The participants’ altered
but lived reality experience is perceived as fractioned, uncertain, and
ambiguous. Thus, skepticism ensues because of the participant’s rituals
expressing vagueness lacking in the exposition of internal feelings. Ritual framework
involves participants to follow the script where being sincere is purely from
the heart that everyone can see and understand. This ritual framework utilizes various
rituals as recognition for unavoidable ambiguities and ambivalences,
constructing a routed lifestyle. It
allows differentiation from sincerity in which prevents participants to live in
the “as is” universe. The “as is” universe is classified as the sincere
framework of participants’ unambiguous perspective of a genuine reality. Sincerity
requires a deep process of self-discovery that does not have a chartered
routine to assist the participant. The consideration of sincere framework must consist of actions
valid only when accompanied by “a genuine and thoughtful state of internal
conviction.” A disadvantage of having An example of the limitation the
sincere framework has can ensue. As the famous saying goes, “Nobody is
perfect.” To be truly sincere is to be perfect at all times in all given
situations. This may create hardships without having a script to follow or an
established set of rules and regulations. Having a routine ritual teaches the
knowledge of adaptation to unavoidable
ambiguities and ambivalences. A real life example of this is when a
husband offers his apologies to his wife for his actions of committing adultery.

These actions provide proof that the husband is not perfect. In this “as is”
universe, if once again he ultimately achieves full sincerity, it is still difficult
for his wife to determine whether or not if he is being sincerely apologetic and
truly won’t cheat again due to his diminished perfection. A fictitious prayer
states, “You have reconciled me to
Yourself through Your Son’s precious blood and so I am begging You to help me
be reconciled to my beloved spouse.  Only You can change the human heart
(Prov 21:1) so I ask You to change my heart to be one that seeks to humble
myself and seek reconciliation in my relationship with my mate.  Too often
I speak without thinking and I know my words hurt my spouse but this is no
excuse for the things that I speak to them.  I ask for Your Spirit to be
sent to help us be reconciled with one another as Your Son’s precious blood was
shed for our being reconciled to You (2 Cor 5:18; Col 1:20). 
This I pray for Your Son’s most holy name and for His glory, Amen.” This participants’ prayer of
reconciliation has been manipulated by reciting information given in texts from
the bible, not purely from heart (2 Cor 5:18; Col 1:20, Prov 21:1). The ritual above contains multiple
layers of meaning that are encoded into its form . The ritual framework in relation to the “as if”, provides
a gateway that perfectly structures the husband’s reconciling strategy so he can
“get it right” by following the script correctly. Once the acquired gateway is formed
and a subjunctive universe is now present for the participant, this furthers progression
of the participant away from the genuine universe. The husband can repent all he wants through the utilization
of this sacrament but doesn’t have to feel sincere about it. Once accomplishing
this ritual, experiences can proceed as they were before by the two working
together with shared “as if” ritual experiences. Examples of these rituals experiences
include kissing goodbye and hello, saying “I love you” before leaving, and praying
before eating together before dinner. This concludes that Christian rituals can
just be actions performed without the characteristic of sincerity needing

            After formulating an argument in result to an in depth
exploration of the two modalities, it is best to infer that both can be interchanged
in accordance to the given situation these two modes are in. Sincerity has an advantage
over ritual on account of the development process that participants have to
undergo in order to achieve true sincerity. The characteristic of sincerity has
to be cultivated into each participant by that participant. Thus, sincerity is
achieved, not ascribed.  In the framing
of ritual, rituals can be given to the participant and studied, leading to the
creation of a common routine for the participant. This enables the participant
to “get it right.” Furthermore,

the rituals performed by a
participant may tend to be monotonous and repetitive. It can get old after
time, in which may direct the participant to move further away from performing
the required rituals that maintain a healthy relationship between the religion
and them self. However, if the participant were to always be sincere with the
performed rituals, the participant wouldn’t care about the negative qualities
such as repetitiveness. Sincerity keeps the participant involved by always caring
deeply about their Christian faith (ex. Marriage). The changing of context for
rituals may keep some participants involved for a brief time, but the participants
who are truly sincere in performing their rituals will not care about the
rituals being monotonous.

            For a participant to be simplistic, honest, and
transparent is the harmonious objective of sincerity, where formal and repetition
from a participant is the objective of rituals. Participants experience mutual endearment
which arises from harmony. By judging the two modalities, this allows the philosophical
framework of the participant to gain mutual values of the two. Also, instability
can follow if one modality dominates the other. The overall objective of sincerity
and ritual is to harmonize the participants’ feelings in which produces a
balanced propriety that has the ability to control their outward expressions. For
this reason, sincerity internal, whereas rituals are external.