Multi the tracks. The structure and performance of transportation

MultiModal System For Safety On RailwaysDheebika.V, Computer Science and Engineering, S.A. Engineering CollegeLokeswari.

R,Computer Science and Engineering, S.A. Engineering CollegeDrR.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Prasanna Kumar, Professor, S.A. Engineering CollegeChennai,India   Abstract– Transportationnetworks are one of the most important aspect for economic development of acountry.Accidents in railways leads to loss of lives and financial loss for thegovernment.

  Modern railway transportsystems are designed under the principles of safety and reliability, and thedevelopment of high-speed railway lines is based on such premises. Thisprojects are designed based on railway safety. Here we propose a systemwhich consisting of ultrasonic sensor, camera, GPS, and GSM. This project describes a camera with MATLAB software which is used inintegrating visuals and programs.

This also gives a graphical user interfacefor this model. This helps us to detect an object  on the track , thus giving us the image ofthe hindrance on the track.GPS are used here to get the location and GSM are usedhere as a communication channel to transmit GPS coordinates, like geographylocation.

             I. INTRODUCTIONRailway transportation is known as thebackbone of Indian economy. Safety on railway networks has to be maintained forthe security of the people is guaranteed. Several monitoring system suchas stereo visions, thermal scanners, and vision metric etc.

, are used inmonitoring platforms. But they could not achieve the goal by detecting theobstacle on the tracks.  Thestructure and performance of transportation network reflects the ease oftravelling and transferring goods among the different parts of a country            thus affecting trade and otheraspects of country’s economy.                 II.ACCIDENTS Accordingto the statistics, signal system failures, track failures, vehicle breakdownare some of the causes of train accidents.

Obstacle on the train tracks is themost important reason. The obstacle may be any vehicle, animals and humanscrossing the track and also in some cases any cracks on the rails. Around15,000 lives are lost rail accidents. The unmanned crossings are responsiblefor maximum number of train accidents             III.EXISTING SYSTEM In all transport systems safety and reliability arehighly considered, particularly in railways. In Railway System all the controlare done through man power.

In this present condition we have faced thefollowing problems wastage of time,wastage of energy and difficulty for a manual operator. Because of theconstant need to improve rail safety, the existence of the objects on tracksare considered, particularly the grade crossings. DISADVANTAGES: ·        Thissystem needs human being to detect the obstacles.·        Ittake time to detect the obstacle.            IV.PROPOSEDSYSTEMInproposed method we develop a safety system for Indian railway and human beings.Thesystem consist of microcontroller which is interfaced with GPS module, GSMmodem, Buzzer, Ultrasonic Sensor, and LCD display.The ultrasonic sensor sensesthe obstacle in front of the train and send information to the centralizedserver using UART and the display unit of the train.

The camera along with theMATLAB capture the detected obstacle image in front of the train and check whattype of obstacles are detected and send the information of the detectedobstacle image to the centralized server using UART. If any obstacles aredetected in front of the train the GPS are used here to find the location ofthe obstacles detected train information, and GSM are used to send the locationof the obstacle detected location information to the nearby railway station byusing UART.Here MATLAB are used to check what type of obstacle are detected. Buzzer are also used here toproduce alarm if any obstacles are detected infront of the train.  ADVANTAGES:AvoidaccidentsIdentifythe obstacles detected train locationReducetime to find the obstacles infront of the train. BLOCKDIAGRAM            ARDUINO Camera MATLAB UART GPS    UART Ultrasonic       Sensor ADC   UART GSM         LCD DISPLAY    Buzzer                                                            HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS: ·        Arduino·        GSM·        GPS·        LCDDisplay·        UART·        Powersupply module·        Ultrasonicsensor·        Camera·        Buzzer   SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS: ·        MATLAB·        EMBEDDEDC                  V.

CONCLUSIONThusthe proposed system helps in preventing accidents due to humans, vehicles andvehicles crossing the tracks by using simple mechanism of obstacle detection.  BASE PAPERJuanJesús García, Álvaro Hernández, Jesús Ureña, Enrique García,”FPGA-Based Architecture for a Multisensory Barrier to Enhance Railway Safety” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION ANDMEASUREMENT, VOL. 65, NO. 6, JUNE 2016 PP.                  REFERENCES 1J. Jesús García, Manuel Mazo, Ana Jiménez, “Efficient Multisensory Barrier forObstacleDetectionon Railways” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, VOL.

11,NO. 3, SEPTEMBER 2010. Pp 702-7132Houssam Salmane, Louahdi Khoudour, and Yassine Ruichek, “A Video-Analysis-BasedRailway–Road Safety System for Detecting Hazard Situations at Level Crossings”IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, VOL. 16, NO. 2, APRIL2015 pp 596-6093Qianru Wang, Bin Guo, Leye Wang, Tong Xin, He Du, Huihui Chen, and Zhiwen Yu”CrowdWatch: Dynamic Sidewalk Obstacle Detection Using Mobile Crowd Sensing”,IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, VOL.

4, NO. 6, DECEMBER 2017  pp 2159-21714Nils Gageik, Paul Benz and Sergio Montenegro, “Obstacle detection and collisionavoidance for UAV with complementary low cost sensors”, Received April 14,2015, accepted May 5, 2015, date of publication May 12, 2015, date of currentversion June 1, 2015. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2432455 pp 599-6095Néstor Morales, Jonay Toledo, Leopoldo Acosta, Javier Sánchez-Medina, “ACombined Voxel and Particle Filter-Based Approach for Fast Obstacle Detectionand Tracking in Automotive Applications”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENTTRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, VOL. 18, NO. 7, JULY 2017, pp 1824-1834 6Vinh Dinh Nguyen, Hau Van Nguyen, Dinh Thi Tran, Sang Jun Lee, and Jae WookJeon, “Learning Framework for Robust Obstacle Detection, Recognition, andTracking”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, VOL.

18,NO. 6, JUNE 2017, pp 1633-1646 7Matej Kristan, Vildana Suli´c Kenk, Stanislav Kova?ci?, Janez Perš, “FastImage-Based Obstacle Detection From Unmanned Surface Vehicles” IEEETRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, VOL. 46, NO. 3, MARCH 2016 pp 641-654 8Javier Hernández-Aceituno, Rafael Arnay, Jonay Toledo, and Leopoldo Acosta,”Using Kinect on an Autonomous Vehicle for Outdoors Obstacle Detection”, IEEESENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. 16, NO. 10, MAY 15, 2016, pp.

3603-3610 9K. Guan, Z. Zhong, and B. Ai, “Assessment of LTE-R using high speed railwaychannel model,” in IEEE Proc.

3rd Int. Conf. Communications Mobile Computing,2011, pp. 461–464 10Saikat Ray, David Starobinski, Ari Trachtenberg, and Rachanee Ungrangsi,”Robust Location Detection With Sensor Networks”, IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTEDAREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 22, NO.

6, AUGUST 2004, pp 1016-1025 11H.-R. Trankler and O.

Kanoun, “Improvement of sensory information usingmulti-sensor and model-based sensor systems,” in Proc. IEEE Instrum. Meas.Technol. Conf.

(IMTC), vol. 3. May 2005, pp. 2259–2263 12K. Chakrabarty, S. S. Iyengar, H.

Qi, and E. Cho, “Grid coverage forsurveillance and target location in distributed sensor networks,” IEEE Trans.Comput., vol.

51, pp. 1448–1453, Dec. 2002.13S. Meguerdichian, S. Slijepcevic, V. Karayan, and M.

Potkonjak, “Localizedalgorithms in wireless ad-hoc networks: Location discovery and sensorexposure,” in Proc. ACM MOBICOM, Long Beach, CA, Oct. 2001, pp. 106–116.

 14K. Celik, S.-J. Chung, M. Clausman, and A. K. Somani, “Monocular vision SLAMfor indoor aerial vehicles,” in Proc.

IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. RobotsSyst., Oct.

2009, pp. 1566_1573. 15M.

C. Kang, S. H. Chae, J. Y. Sun, J. W.

Yoo, and S. J. Ko, “A novelobstacle detection method based on deformable grid for the visuallyimpaired,” Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 61, pp.

376-383, 2015 16A. D. Zayas, C. A. G. Perez, and P.

M. Gomez, “Third-generation partnershipproject standards: For delivery of critical communications for railways,” IEEEVeh. Technol. Mag., vol.

9, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2014 17A. Ess, B. Leibe, K.

Schindler, and L. van Gool, “A mobile vision system forrobust multi-person tracking,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis.Pattern Recognit.

(CVPR), Jun. 2008, pp. 1–8. 18Subhan Khan, Mujtaba Hussain Jaffery, Athar Hanif, and Muhammad Rizwan Asif,”Teaching Tool for a Control Systems Laboratory Using a Quadrotor as a Plant inMATLAB” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 60, NO. 4, NOVEMBER 2017, pp249-256 19J. L.

Guzman, S. Dormido, and M. Berenguel, “Interactivity in education: Anexperience in the automatic control field,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ.,vol. 21, no.

2, pp. 360–371, 2013. 20P. Bahl and V. N.

Padmanabhan, “RADAR: An in-building RF-based user locationand tracking system,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Tel-Aviv, Israel, Mar.2000, pp. 775–784.