p.p1 ends off that reason cant be the only

p.

p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 21.0px; font: 10.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

0px Arial; color: #000000; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000; background-color: #ffffff}span.s1 {font-kerning: none}For the bundle theory of self ,  Hume considers what impressions give humans the concept of self. We think of ourselves as stable characteristics that last over time. No matter how closely we look at our own experiences, we may never look at anything more than the impressions, sensations, and feelings . We can’t look at ourselves in one way. There is no impression we can have that tie our impressions together. In saying that , we can never be fully aware of ourselves. We can only be aware of what we are experiencing at any moment.

Between our feelings and ideas, we may link them through time by memory, but there is no real hard evidence that ties them. This argument also comes along to the idea of the soul. Hume says that self is just a bundle of perceptions that are linked . Hume fights that our idea of self is a result of our habits . This belief is most common , but there is no support for it .

Hume doesn’t agree that  reason plays anything in determining a role in motivating or discouraging actions . Instead, he believes that the game changer in human behavior is passion. As a example of proof, he asks us to look at human actions according to instrumentalism . This has to do actions serving the persons purpose or not . Most of the time they do not and that we tend to act out for some other motivation. Based on these arguments, Hume ends off that reason cant be the only thing to motivate anyone.

Rather, reason helps us make judgments. Therefore, reason does not make the basis of morality, it only acts as a advisor . On top of that , immorality is immoral. Not because it goes against reason but because it is not pleasing to us. This argument angered the clergy and other religious philosophers who thought that God gave humans reason to discover and understand morals . By removing reason, he denied God’s role as the source of morality.