Syria in 2013 when Barack Obama was forced to

Syria and the
other political players

The political and field developments and the
firm responses by Syria and its allies to the American interventions
constituted an important strategic shift in the course of the war against the
terrorist forces and the supporting countries. On the one hand, the war is at
its end, and it has become firmly anchored in Syria after Syria’s entire depth
is under the control of Syria’s national state. Syria has become close to
defeating the forces of terrorism from its land and declaring victory. On the
other hand, American plans and manoeuvres aimed at The establishment of a
buffer zone on the border between Syria and Iraq prevents the geographical
communication between the parties to the resistance alliance. On the third
hand, the Russian-Iranian response to the repeated American attacks on the
Syrian army showed the magnitude of the challenges that would confront America
if it thought for a moment of launching a large-scale aggression against Syria
or continued its attempts to block the progress of the Syrian army on the
ground. More dangerous than the one that faced Washington in 2013 when Barack
Obama was forced to back off the war for several reasons we mentioned earlier.
It was natural that the new challenge of bringing Russia and Iran together with
their deterrent power in Syria in the face of American power, which drew red
lines against any US dependence on Syria, would push Trump to not listen to
extremist Zionist voices within the White House. Not rushing to try the option
of the game of the brink with Syria and its allies, because this will only
force America to retreat again from engaging in a war more dangerous than the
Iraq war, which Trump does not want.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The American and Iranian responses to Syria have
increased in the face of American aggression. The Russian and Iranian responses
to these American messages have led to a strong opposition explosion. In the
corridors of decision-making in Washington against any military adventure in
Syria. Washington’s decision to drop the Syrian warplane over Raqqa countryside
to the speed of the resistance alliance and Russia to strengthen their
deterrent power and raise the level of alertness and readiness to confront any
large American military aggression in Syria, which reminded Washington of the
strategic balance of power created by the qualitative Russian military presence
on Syrian soil , And raised the level of Iranian contribution to the fight
against terrorism in Syria, and the harmony in response to the blatant American
attack on the Syrian plane important signs indicated the high level of
coordination between Syria’s allies in the face of any possible US escalation,
Among the Iranian missile strike against the sites of «Dahesh» in Deir Al-Zour
and the Russian warning strongly to the United States, declaring that the
aircraft of the International Alliance are banned in the scope of
Russian-Syrian operations, and are subject to drop if monitored by the ground
and air defence.

On the economic front, Iran has made billions of
dollars in its war in Syria to keep Bashar   Al-Assad. . The fundamentals of the
Syrian economy were based on the sectors of industry, tourism and agriculture.
The Syrian industry and tourism, after the country’s political crisis, have
been almost completely destroyed and agriculture has been disrupted in large
parts of the country. For these reasons
we can say that Iran will be the biggest winner to achieve its strategic goals
in Syria, and cannot return as it was before 2011. In brief and useful, the
Iranian situation in Syria can be summed up in the following sentence:
“Iran is winning the battles”