Syria and theother political players The political and field developments and thefirm responses by Syria and its allies to the American interventionsconstituted an important strategic shift in the course of the war against theterrorist forces and the supporting countries.
On the one hand, the war is atits end, and it has become firmly anchored in Syria after Syria’s entire depthis under the control of Syria’s national state. Syria has become close todefeating the forces of terrorism from its land and declaring victory. On theother hand, American plans and manoeuvres aimed at The establishment of abuffer zone on the border between Syria and Iraq prevents the geographicalcommunication between the parties to the resistance alliance. On the thirdhand, the Russian-Iranian response to the repeated American attacks on theSyrian army showed the magnitude of the challenges that would confront Americaif it thought for a moment of launching a large-scale aggression against Syriaor continued its attempts to block the progress of the Syrian army on theground. More dangerous than the one that faced Washington in 2013 when BarackObama was forced to back off the war for several reasons we mentioned earlier.It was natural that the new challenge of bringing Russia and Iran together withtheir deterrent power in Syria in the face of American power, which drew redlines against any US dependence on Syria, would push Trump to not listen toextremist Zionist voices within the White House. Not rushing to try the optionof the game of the brink with Syria and its allies, because this will onlyforce America to retreat again from engaging in a war more dangerous than theIraq war, which Trump does not want.The American and Iranian responses to Syria haveincreased in the face of American aggression.
The Russian and Iranian responsesto these American messages have led to a strong opposition explosion. In thecorridors of decision-making in Washington against any military adventure inSyria. Washington’s decision to drop the Syrian warplane over Raqqa countrysideto the speed of the resistance alliance and Russia to strengthen theirdeterrent power and raise the level of alertness and readiness to confront anylarge American military aggression in Syria, which reminded Washington of thestrategic balance of power created by the qualitative Russian military presenceon Syrian soil , And raised the level of Iranian contribution to the fightagainst terrorism in Syria, and the harmony in response to the blatant Americanattack on the Syrian plane important signs indicated the high level ofcoordination between Syria’s allies in the face of any possible US escalation,Among the Iranian missile strike against the sites of «Dahesh» in Deir Al-Zourand the Russian warning strongly to the United States, declaring that theaircraft of the International Alliance are banned in the scope ofRussian-Syrian operations, and are subject to drop if monitored by the groundand air defence.On the economic front, Iran has made billions ofdollars in its war in Syria to keep Bashar Al-Assad. . The fundamentals of theSyrian economy were based on the sectors of industry, tourism and agriculture.
The Syrian industry and tourism, after the country’s political crisis, havebeen almost completely destroyed and agriculture has been disrupted in largeparts of the country. For these reasonswe can say that Iran will be the biggest winner to achieve its strategic goalsin Syria, and cannot return as it was before 2011. In brief and useful, theIranian situation in Syria can be summed up in the following sentence:”Iran is winning the battles”