The autonomous region of Tibet has endured countless human rights violations from the People’s Republic of China. The international community ought to address human rights violations in Tibet through global condemnation and economic sanctions on China, which will incentivize China to abolish their oppressive policies and further the Tibetan Independence Movement. Despite China’s unwarranted territorial claims, the nation of Tibet experienced peaceful independence for nearly forty years. The region separated from China in 1913 and remained “Independent…in 1950” (Haerens and Zott 3), until invaded on October 7th by the Chinese Military. During this time, states such as Great Britain and India acknowledged Tibet’s sovereignty to an extent and even began to develop trade relationships in order to support progress for the region’s economy (Spence 7). Though all advancements came to an abrupt halt in the fall of 1950, Tibet saw a short lived era of development and harmony that had been lost from the area for centuries. This period not only helped integrate Tibet into the international sphere, it also cultivated unity among residents as “The…Dalai Lama ruled….in peace ,” (Szczepanski 5). Due to Buddhism acting as the foundation of Tibetan culture and the center of everyday life in the territory, the blending of religion and politics lead to an amicable, cooperative society. The contentment that flourished throughout Tibet under their independence has not transpired in the years that have followed the Chinese intervention. The People’s Republic of China consistently oppresses the Tibetan population through the limitation of their fundamental human rights such as the freedoms of demonstration and religion. In attempt to silence Tibet activists, “The government…controls freedom of expression” (Amnesty International 1) within the region.Works Cited Amnesty International. “China Abuses Human Rights.” China, edited by Noah Berlatsky, Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http://link.galegroup.com.lscsproxy2.lonestar.edu/apps/doc/EJ3010117270/OVIC?u-=nhmccd_main=96d21478. Accessed 11 Jan. 2018. Originally published in China—Amnesty International Report 2009, Amnesty International, 2009.Brigden, Stephanie. “The United States Should Do More to Support Tibet’s Autonomy.” Tibet, edited by Margaret Haerens and Lynn M. Zott, Greenhaven Press, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http://link.galegroup.com.lscsproxy2.lonestar.edu/apps/doc /EJ3010577247/OVIC?u =nhmccd_main=24da7aa1. Accessed 14 Jan. 2018. Originally published as “Tibetans Reject Chinese Rule with One Voice,” CNN.com, 11 Dec. 2012.Haerens, Margaret and Lynn M. Zott “Tibet Should Be Fully Independent and Self-Governing.” Tibet, Greenhaven Press, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http://link.galegroup.com.lscsproxy2.lonestar.edu/apps/doc/EJ3010577234/OVIC?u=nhmccd_main=3c0ee33b. Accessed 22 Jan. 2018. Originally published as “Briefing Paper: Centenary of the 1913 Independence Proclamation by His Holiness the XIVth Dalai Lama,”, 2013. Web Accessed 11 Jan 2018.Lerner, Adrienne Wilmoth, et al.”International Religious Freedom Report for 2005.” Human and Civil Rights: Essential Primary Sources, Gale, 2006, pp. 433-437. Opposing Viewpoints in Context,http://link.galegroup.com.lscsproxy2.lonestar.edu/apps/doc/-CX2560000157/OVIC?u=nhmccd_main=ff3440d1. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.Lixiong, Wang. “Roadmap of Tibetan Independence.” China Perspectives, vol. 2009, no. 3, Sept. 2009, pp. 74-79. EBSCOhost, lscsproxy.lonestar.edu/login?url=http://-search.ebscohost.com-login.aspx?direct=true=ip,cpid=s1088435=a9h=44768351=ehost-live.Spence, Heather, British policy and the ‘development’ of Tibet 1912-1933, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Department of History and Politics, Faculty of Arts, University of Wollongong, 1993. h p://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1433 Thakur, Ravni. “The Marginalization of Tibetans in Tibet: Rethinking the Development Story.” Development & Change, vol. 47, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 203-217. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/dech.12214. Web Accessed 14 Jan 2018Zimmerman, Jonathan. “A Global Boycott on Chinese Goods Will Spur Political Change in Tibet.” Tibet, edited by Margaret Haerens and Lynn M. Zott, Greenhaven Press, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, http://link.galegroup.com.lscsproxy2.=lonestar.edu/apps/-doc/EJ3010577252/OVIC?u=nhmccd_main=ea3d9480. Accessed 12 Jan. 2018. Originally published as “When You Go Shopping, Give Thought to Tibet,” Chicago Tribune, 9 Apr. 2012
All Research Proposal
- WRITTEN Piaget believes in certain principles of development. His
- I assistant trainee manager in which the skills that
- Abstract—In parameter. In addition, weevaluated the performance of the
- To contraception (Oudshoorn, 2004). Over the past 50 years,
- Background policies focus on extension of the centralised grid.
- ICICI EPS increased to 32.19 and after that company
- Dagens i 1600-1700 tallet, var det veldig mye overtroiske
- Mental is concerned in the cognizance of their abilities,
- Årsakene Kroatia, Slovenia og Bosnia-Herzegovina, som var katolsk dominert.