Value view of the world consequently help in the

Value of Documentaries (Videos)

Documentary films are a collection of
nonfictional motion pictures that are intended to document and depict a
given reality aspect such as real events, real peoples, real catastrophes,
real nature and real how-to with the main purpose being instructing and
maintaining the historical records. When shooting the documentaries, the
filmmaker chooses what he or she wants to film, and then will study what he or
she has taken while following the lives of the people that were involved. I’ve learned a lot of material from the videos in
this course that could not be know by the assigned readings. This is mainly due
to the fact that documentary films helped me in understanding the present and
past world on the grounds that huge numbers of the accessible documentaries
film the past occasions that happened and influenced the entire world. The
documentary films depicted to me, the alternate points of view of the world
consequently help in the changing of the strategies in a few nations. Documentary
films give a superior comprehension of the present news cycle since they give
an easy to refute perspective of the world which will start incredible
research. Film documentaries in this course encouraged inventive and critical
thinking concerning the world and gave facts that assisted in the end of any
superstitions and myths that were present to me. An example of this would be in
World War 1, soldiers started becoming heavily strapped and being accustomed to
using firepower at high usage levels (1). Although this was true, after
watching a documentary film also on World War 1, I witnessed that many soldiers
were not properly trained at all in using these high artillery firearms, and
that a lot of them did not feel too comfortable in actually incorporating these
firearms to their new way of warfare (2). In my opinion I feel that moving
imagery is compulsory in needing to understand the history of warfare. This is
mainly true because film documentaries offer people with both the historical
and learning experiences which carry a high educational value. Many documentary
films in regards to the history of warfare are based on specific countries and
nations. Accordingly, individuals who have never been to those places and
cannot travel to these countries can exclusively watch these films and get a
deeper insight on how the environment of these war ridden nations actually
were. After reading about the gruesome sceneries of world war 1, it sounded bad
but I did not fully process the impact it had on individuals nor did I imagine
how it could’ve look like. This was until a documentary film changed my whole
perspective on that type of atmosphere and environment. Novice soldiers were
absolutely squeamish while the veterans were so programmed to this that they paid
the dead bodies no mind. The battlefield was shown in such a way in the film
that it made you feel sick for the soldiers. Covered in dirt, blood, and
smelling like gun powder was some of the visuals which were shown (2). In this
case, the documentary film enabled me to experience what soldiers might have
felt like, and made me feel as if I went to that region on my ones and did some
physical, observational research. Humans and people in general are said to be
visional learners. Documentary films in regards to the history of warfare help
us see visually how certain military tactics were preformed. Unlike the
reading, visual and moving imagery allows us to draw proper implications of the
event on hand, and gives a more thorough explanation of how these military
tactics unfolded, how they were countered and what types of movements they
should have done in order to be more successful, if at all. All in all, I feel
like documentary films and moving imagery will keep getting more and more
important as time passes and younger generations will start educating
themselves on the past historical warfares. Documentaries will be more
important than ever as there will be more information that has been revealed
and would be incorporated in these films instead of books due to the fact that
it is much more convenient, interesting and allows for a more deeper
comprehension of what took place in the past. History books are too wordy, and
technology is becoming more & more prominent which makes documentary films
on the history of warfare a perfect, enhanced alternative to educating
individuals on the history of warfare.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Causes & Consequences of First
& Second Congo Wars

Democratic Republic of Congo is gradually recuperating from a conflict known as
Africa’s first world war, which prompted the loss of some five million lives in
the vicinity of 1994 and 2003, however numerous eastern territories are still
tormented by savagery as different renegade gatherings keep on operating there.
In the mid twentieth Century, Belgian powers arrived and oppressed millions,
while King Leopold ruled the nation as his own fiefdom (3). Amid a difficult
autonomy battle in the 1960s, the tremendous nation practically broke down as
locales battled each other. Be that as it may, Joseph Mobutu seized control in
1965 and began crushing internal rebellions and bringing together the country –
inevitably changing its name to Zaire (3). However, Mobutu was soon tempted by
riches and once he controlled the greater part of the nation and accomplished a
level of dependability and flourishing, he started utilizing the nation’s
wealth for one thing – to guarantee he stayed in power. As his govern went on,
his pillaging proceeded and the nation step by step slipped out of his control.
The 1994 genocide in neighboring Rwanda hurried his defeat and helped dive DR
Congo into the deadliest clash in African history. Congo has persevered through
a close consistent condition of war and turmoil in the course of recent years.
Its destiny has been inseparably bound with its minor neighbor, Rwanda, where
in 1994 a Hutu extremist regime slaughtered 800,000 Tutsis in the last genocide
of the twentieth century (3). Tutsi rebels drove the ­extremists from power and
sent more than a million Hutu evacuees escaping into Congo (at that point
Zaire). The displaced person camps in Congo wound up noticeably outfitted bases
from which Hutu extremists could proceed with the war against the new Rwandan
government. In 1996, Rwanda moved against the camps and attacked Congo, in the
long run taking the capital, Kinshasa, and introducing Laurent Kabila as
president. However, Kabila demonstrated less consistent than Rwanda had trusted
in the war against Hutu extremists. Rwanda attacked again in 1998, prompting a
drawn out war that attracted the Angolans and Zimbabweans on Congo’s side,
while Uganda and Burundi agreed with Rwanda. An unsteady peace ­agreement in
2002 saw the withdrawal of outside armed forces from Congo, albeit nearby
radical groups tied to the Rwandan government kept on controlling a significant
part of the east of the nation (3). There was a lot at stake for the fighters
and civilians. Their freedom, their nation, a bright future, important minerals
and resources within their country, and most importantly their lives. DR Congo
is to a great degree wealthy – and to a great degree, huge. Comparable in size
to Western Europe, it is rich in precious stones, gold, copper, cobalt and
zinc. The nation likewise has supplies of coltan, which is utilized as a part
of cell phones and other electronic devices, and cassiterite, utilized as a
part of food packaging. Tragically for the general population of DR Congo, its
asset wealth has rarely been harnessed for their benefit due to the impact of
internal wars and twisted politics (3). The First and Second Congo Wars, which
started the savagery, included various remote armed forces and speculators from
Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Angola, Namibia, Chad, Libya, and Sudan, among others, and
has been devastating to the point that it is sometimes called the “African
World War.”It is also called the African World War because so many African
countries were involved, and approximately five million four hundred thousand
people had died mostly due to diseases and starvation. An additional two
million people were displaced from their homes and or sought asylum in
neighbouring countries (3). Although a formal end to the war had been
implemented in 2003, one thousand people died daily in 2004 from effectively
preventable instances of disease and malnutrition. The impacts of the warfare
from the late 90s to early 2000s still has an impact on how people live on a
day to day basis, as well as the political structure, and policy and
regulations that take place their today. Rebel groups have been appearing at an
increasingly alarming amount since then, in the eastern part of Congo. They
commit inhumane acts of violence with reports of them engaging in mass killings
and rapes (3). There have also been a lot of cases of internal political
members supplying rebel groups with military weapons which continues to be of
detriment to The Republic of Congo.